<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo Stitching for Panoramic Effects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brucewaynehart.com/2009/01/photo-stitching-for-panoramic-effects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brucewaynehart.com/2009/01/photo-stitching-for-panoramic-effects/</link>
	<description>Personal Blog of Bruce Wayne</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photos Mariage Paris</title>
		<link>http://brucewaynehart.com/2009/01/photo-stitching-for-panoramic-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>Photos Mariage Paris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 10:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brucewaynehart.com/?p=364#comment-883</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard it&#039;s good to have the zoom level somewhere in the middle so the pictures don&#039;t become too concave/convex?? 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chg-photographie.com/&quot; rel=&quot;dofollow&quot; title=&quot;Photos Mariage Paris&quot;&gt;Photos Mariage Paris&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve heard it&#39;s good to have the zoom level somewhere in the middle so the pictures don&#39;t become too concave/convex??<br />
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chg-photographie.com/&quot; rel=&quot;dofollow&quot; title=&quot;Photos Mariage Paris&quot;&gt;Photos Mariage Paris&lt;/a&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puzz</title>
		<link>http://brucewaynehart.com/2009/01/photo-stitching-for-panoramic-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>puzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brucewaynehart.com/?p=364#comment-803</guid>
		<description>Correction ;) with autostitch there is no need to manually match points...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction <img src='http://brucewaynehart.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  with autostitch there is no need to manually match points&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: batman</title>
		<link>http://brucewaynehart.com/2009/01/photo-stitching-for-panoramic-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>batman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brucewaynehart.com/?p=364#comment-802</guid>
		<description>i looked at them all a few years ago (on linux tho). they seemed very technical, altho very powerful, but one had to match points on each photo in the overlap zones, and try several times before getting a suitable result. 

this canon tool just works.  but yes, i&#039;m sure there&#039;s a lot of ways to skin a cat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i looked at them all a few years ago (on linux tho). they seemed very technical, altho very powerful, but one had to match points on each photo in the overlap zones, and try several times before getting a suitable result. </p>
<p>this canon tool just works.  but yes, i&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a lot of ways to skin a cat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puzz</title>
		<link>http://brucewaynehart.com/2009/01/photo-stitching-for-panoramic-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>puzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brucewaynehart.com/?p=364#comment-801</guid>
		<description>Try autostitch, it is a very nice and easy to use stittching app. I also used Canon&#039;s app, but switched first to hugin, then autostitch and AutoPano pro. 

Nice photos, by the way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try autostitch, it is a very nice and easy to use stittching app. I also used Canon&#8217;s app, but switched first to hugin, then autostitch and AutoPano pro. </p>
<p>Nice photos, by the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
